Swiss Supreme Court rules on the setting aside of an award allegedly influenced by a crime

4. Juni 2014

According to Article 123 (f) of the Swiss Federal Statute on the Federal Tribunal (FSFT), the revision of a judgment may be requested where criminal proceedings establish that the court’s decision has been influenced by a criminal offence.

According to Article 123 (f) of the Swiss Federal Statute on the Federal Tribunal (FSFT), the revision of a judgment may be requested where criminal proceedings establish that the court’s decision has been influenced by a criminal offence; this even applies to cases where criminal proceedings have not led to a conviction.

Neuerer Artikel

Zurück zur Übersicht

Älterer Artikel

Streitbeilegung

Investitionsschutz

Swiss Supreme Court rules on the setting aside of an award allegedly influenced by a crime

According to Article 123 (f) of the Swiss Federal Statute on the Federal Tribunal (FSFT), the revision of a judgment may be requested where criminal proceedings establish that the court’s decision has been influenced by a criminal offence.

Swiss Supreme Court rules on the setting aside of an award allegedly influenced by a crime

Ac­cording to Ar­ti­cle 123 (f) of the Swiss Fe­deral Sta­tu­te on the Fe­deral Tri­bu­nal (FSFT), the re­vi­si­on of a judgment may be re­quested where cri­mi­nal pro­cee­dings es­tab­lish that the court’s de­cis­i­on has been in­flu­en­ced by a cri­mi­nal of­fence.

According to Article 123 (f) of the Swiss Federal Statute on the Federal Tribunal (FSFT), the revision of a judgment may be requested where criminal proceedings establish that the court’s decision has been influenced by a criminal offence.