Recent Highlights

Our lawyers are currently advising

  • a prime international real estate development company seated in Austria in a VIAC arbitration in a dispute arising out of a share purchase option agreement.
  • two expert adjudicators in litigation proceedings relating to a dispute arising out of the refurbishment of a large fashion centre.
  • a leading company in the field of energy, infrastructure and environmental engineering in a multiparty ICC arbitration governed by English law concerning mechanical works on an industrial plant.
  • a leading manufacturer and supplier of child care products in a VIAC arbitration against its former distributor arising out of the termination of a distribution agreement.
  • a worldwide leading manufacturer of electric machines, in an ICC arbitration regarding an unlawful setoff of claims deriving from two different power plant projects.
  • a leading European delivery and logistic company in an ad-hoc arbitration in relation to the adaption of a nation-wide cooperation agreement with a US retail bank.
  • a leading manufacturer of steam generators and air pollution control systems, in an ICC arbitration in a dispute arising out of a refurbishment contract.
  • a natural gas company headquartered in Germany, in a VIAC arbitration in relation to a dispute arising out of a gas storage agreement.
  • two affiliates of one of the world’s leading suppliers for hydraulic power generations, in an ICC arbitration in a dispute arising out of claims under a major power plant project.
  • a global supplier for plants, equipment and services for power stations, in an ICC arbitration in relation to purportedly non-fulfilled and violated contractual guarantees under a refurbishment contract in the hundred million euro range.
  • a major insurance group in the CEE in an ad-hoc arbitration in a dispute resulting from the global insurance program of a worldwide leading mining company.
  • a leading insurance company acting as reinsurer in an ad-hoc arbitration in a dispute arising out of a retrocession agreement with regard to the reinsurer’s coverage claim.
  • an international trade company in a VIAC arbitration against a Panama-based company in relation to a dispute arising out of contracts of sale.
  • one of the world’s leading suppliers for hydraulic power generation, in an ICC arbitration in a dispute arising out of claims under a major power plant project.
  • leader in the global market for hydraulic power generation, in an  ICC arbitration in relation to a major refurbishment project in South Eastern Europe.
  • two affiliates of one of the world’s leading suppliers for hydraulic power generation, in an ICC arbitration against a state-owned company in a dispute arising out of claims under a major power plant project.
  • a judicial institution in South-Eastern Europe in relation to the implementation of a country wide ADR-system.

Our lawyers have successfully advised

  • global supplier for plants, equipment and services for power stations in an ICC arbitration with regard to the binding nature of an adjudicator’s decision rendered under the terms of a refurbishment contract in South-Eastern Europe.
  • a leading supplier for plants, equipment and services for power stations in adjudication proceedings in South-Eastern Europe relating to the refurbishment of a thermal power plant
  • a world leading supplier of steel piping products in an ICC arbitration arising from a desalination plant situated in Cyprus.
  • two affiliates of one of the world’s leading suppliers for hydraulic power generation in an ICC arbitration relating to a power plant project in South-Eastern Europe.
  • two major energy enterprises in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe in two separate VIAC arbitrations as legal experts in Austrian arbitration law.
  • a group of investors against a world leader in pharmaceutical industry in a post M&A transaction dispute under the Vienna Rules
  • the leading Austrian group of care taking facilities in an ad-hoc arbitration in an dispute arising out of a pledge agreement in connection with several share purchases.
  • UK group of companies in the telecommunications technology sector in a dispute under the Vienna Rules arising out of a licensing agreement for the world-wide commercialization of cabling and transmission technology. The dispute involves claims for performance, injunctive relief and damages.
  • an international real estate development and financing company in an ICC arbitration arising out of the sale of a commercial real estate project in Eastern Europe. The dispute involves claims for payment of the final purchase price as well as claims for repayment of outstanding loans.
  • an Eastern-European industrial design company in a dispute arising out of a joint-venture agreement regarding the development  and exploitation of maritime technology. The dispute involves claims for damages due to default and non-fulfillment of the contract.
  • a world-leading provider of engineering services and electro-mechanical equipment in arbitration proceedings under the SIAC Rules relating to claims under refurbishments contracts in a State in Southeast Asia.
  • an Austrian investors and energy company in relation to claims for compensation arising out of legislative changes enacted by a State in Eastern Europe in the field of alternative energy production and distribution under bilateral and multilateral investment treaties.
  • a world-leading provider of engineering services and electro-mechanical equipment in injunctive state court proceedings at the commercial court in Vienna relating to unfair competition claims.
  • world-leading supplier of electronics and electrical engineering in a dispute under the DIS Rules regarding warranties and defects under a framework and delivery agreement for a major transportation system project in Europe. The dispute involves claims for contract performance as well as claims for damages.
  • an investor in a large European energy company in a dispute against a state in South-Eastern Europe. This complex dispute involved arbitration proceedings under the ICSID and ICC Rules based on a bilateral investment treaty and the Energy Charter Treaty.
  • an Austrian tennis player in proceedings before the Tribunal Arbitral du Sport (Lausanne).
  • and represented a world-leading provider of engineering services and electro-mechanical equipment in a multi-jurisdictional construction & engineering dispute under the ICC Arbitration Rules relating to two plant construction projects in Australia and the US.
  • a television production company based in Eastern European against a world-wide television broadcasting company regarding the unwinding of a licensing agreement.
  • and represented a consortium of shareholders in South-Eastern Europe in a dispute against two major international beverage corporations relating to the acquisition of a former state-owned brewery. The claims involved both damages and the exercising of pre-emptive rights.
  • a Russian global supplier of energy-related equipment in an ICC arbitration on a dispute against a state-owned electricity supplier in South East Europe.
  • a Swiss-based finance and investment company with regard to a significant real estate and construction project that was suspended by state authorities under bilateral investment treaties.
  • a group of European investors and energy companies in relation to claims for compensation arising out of legislative changes enacted by the Czech Republic in the field of alternative energy production and distribution under bilateral and multilateral investment treaties.